Jaisae zulmath mae noor rehetha hai, as if moonlight in the night, aab adham ka yai haule hai, now it is Adam’s turn to catch its glimpse. Yae jo halka halka suroor hai. The life breath that fills those who believe in God.

Jaisae zulmath mae noor rehetha hai;  God your love is life to all who yearn for you.

Mohandas and Satyagraha as moral principles for all times of hatred in the world, so greatly loved by God. Stitches in time when you do the crime.

Mohandas Gandhi, explorer of penitence. NOT pain. Non-violence is never an abundance of hate and crime. MK Gandhi and independence accused of these values NOT?

Penitence, the moral for our past.  Hopefully our present and future too.

Why oppression and civil liberties are not mutually exclusive; the case for uncivil liberty. John Stuart Mill explained that consequential harm was not related in any way to the harm principle.

 

Mill’s Harm Principle is that indirect harm does not apply.

Mill writes, “In many cases, an individual, in pursuing a legitimate object, necessarily and therefore legitimately causes pain or loss to others, or intercepts a good which they had a reasonable hope of obtaining (1009).” Who is he to say that while pursuing an object pain or loss is necessary at all? The definition of necessary, according to Webster’s Dictionary, is absolutely essential or needed to achieve a certain result or affect. I do not think that in any way it would be necessary to cause harm while trying to achieve a goal. There are so many ways to go about to achieve a goal without causing harm to someone. However, if for example, you and a coworker are in position for a promotion, you are both fighting against each other for the position, you receive the promotion and unintentionally hurt the other worker, and this harm caused does not put you at fault. If you did something evil or something that would purposely cause the individual to not get the promotion this is intentional and you should be placed at fault. In summary Mill believes that consequential harm will not apply to the harm principle; however I believe that the circumstances of the situation are very important in be able to consider whether or…”

https://www.bartleby.com/essay/John-Stuart-Mills-Harm-Principle-P3J7WXYVC

Truth’s Aristocracy versus Truth’s Privilege, An anatomical essay not?? The blood of aristocracy; its origin. Pure blood; its origin. Disease; its … By William Washington Evans.

“If a man possess knowledge of everlasting truths, of which the world is ignorant or neglect them, he naturally feels bound in his duty to his God and to the human race, to unfold those truths to the understanding man and extend to their furthest limits. It is his privilege to call upon others to assist him in this great work of circulating useful and healing truths to his fellow-creatures. Therefore, the readers of my book are kindly invited to lend them to their friends and induce their friends to become possessors of them for themselves, that they and their children may be instructed in the contents, thereof, which instruction will be of service to all youthful minds– for such minds love truth before they are hardened in sin.”