De Jure, shared freedoms of stolen property=laws. De Facto shared values=truth.
How can a soul be led to achieve such a union?
Obedient Value is also to be understood as our Law of Value. The Rabbinate, Yerushalayim, Israel. Direct democracy also called pure democracy, forms of direct participation of citizens in democratic decision making, in contrast to indirect or representative democracy, based on the sovereignty of the people. This can happen in the form of an assembly democracy or by initiative and referendum with ballot voting, with direct voting on issues instead of for candidates or parties. Sometimes the term is also used for electing representatives in a direct vote as opposed to indirect elections (by voting for an electing body, electoral college, etc.) as well as for recalling elected officeholders. Direct democracy may be understood as a full-scale system of political institutions, but in modern times, it means most often specific decision-making institutions in the broader system environment of representative democracy. Decision-making theories range from objective rational decision making, which assumes that individuals will make the same decisions given the same information and preferences, to the more subjective logic of appropriateness, which assumes that specific institutional and organizational contexts matter in the decisions that individuals make.
Mill’s Harm Principle is that indirect harm does not apply.
Mill writes, “In many cases, an individual, in pursuing a legitimate object, necessarily and therefore legitimately causes pain or loss to others, or intercepts a good which they had a reasonable hope of obtaining (1009).” Who is he to say that while pursuing an object pain or loss is necessary at all? The definition of necessary, according to Webster’s Dictionary, is absolutely essential or needed to achieve a certain result or affect. I do not think that in any way it would be necessary to cause harm while trying to achieve a goal. There are so many ways to go about to achieve a goal without causing harm to someone. However, if for example, you and a coworker are in position for a promotion, you are both fighting against each other for the position, you receive the promotion and unintentionally hurt the other worker, and this harm caused does not put you at fault. If you did something evil or something that would purposely cause the individual to not get the promotion this is intentional and you should be placed at fault. In summary Mill believes that consequential harm will not apply to the harm principle; however I believe that the circumstances of the situation are very important in be able to consider whether or…”
“Derean reehae na aha derena Ahshiquon kae Khuda ho gayae hai, aap maashuuq kya ho gayae, chaar so mujhko ghirae liya hai, maerae dil sae maerae jaan ho gayaen… kya kahun thumko maerae sanam hai, humtho aab bezubaan hogaiyaen ashiquon ke khuda ho gaaen ab masshuq kya ho gayaen apne hoto ko yuseen lay liya hai aaj therae razthaa ho gayae maeri maieth pae vo aagayae saarae vadhae wafa ho gai, askhikon kae khudha ho gai hai aap maashuuq kya ho gayae. Maeri maieth pae aakae kahaan hai thum tho suuch much wafa ho gayae maeri maiath thum tho suuch muuch wafa ho gayae. ” “Many in Paul’s day were accusing God of being unrighteous in electing some and not others. In this lab, John Piper explains what the righteousness of God is showing his definition from several texts. In doing so, he shows that God indeed does all he does for the glory of his own name.”
The Centurian who became a Christian, contrarian extraordinare (not) for Jesus’s word and servanthood. “Lord I am not worthy that you should enter under my roof but only say the word and let my servant be healed.” Jesus replies, “I too am a man under authority with soldiers under me.” This man was a Roman soldier, a representative of Israel’s enemy. Jesus moved his head and chuckled. He understood what even these Jewish elders didn’t yet grasp.